This text has undergone thorough fact-checking to ensure accuracy and reliability. All information presented is backed by verified sources and reputable data. By adhering to stringent fact-checking standards, we aim to provide you with reliable and trustworthy content. You can trust the information presented here to make informed decisions with confidence.
Navigating debt collection in Boston requires expertise in Massachusetts-specific laws and federal regulations. A debt collection attorney helps businesses and individuals recover unpaid debts effectively while ensuring compliance with strict legal standards. Here's what you need to know:
Hiring a skilled attorney ensures compliance, maximizes recovery, and protects against legal risks in Boston’s stringent debt collection landscape.
Debt Collection Attorney Fee Structures and Services in Boston
Debt collection attorneys play a crucial role in litigation and asset recovery, but their expertise extends further. They also focus on ensuring compliance with legal standards and assisting businesses in managing debt portfolios. Their goal is to help creditors recover delinquent funds while adhering to both federal and state regulations.
Navigating debt collection laws can be complicated, but attorneys ensure creditors stay on the right side of the law. In Massachusetts, for example, regulations (940 CMR 7.00) apply not only to third-party agencies but also to original creditors, their attorneys, and debt buyers. Attorneys help creditors comply with rules like the "two-call rule", which limits home calls to no more than two per debt within seven days, and ensure contact times are restricted to between 8:00 a.m. and 9:00 p.m..
When filing lawsuits, attorneys prepare detailed affidavits in line with Massachusetts Rule of Civil Procedure 8.1. These affidavits must document critical information, such as the original creditor's name, the date of the last payment, and the full chain of debt ownership. Attorneys also personally review all documentation before pursuing default judgments.
"Massachusetts law prohibits unfair, deceptive, and unreasonable debt-collection practices. The Attorney General has issued debt collection regulations that establish standards by defining unfair and deceptive acts and practices for the collection of debt from Massachusetts consumers."
– Office of the Attorney General
Once compliance is secured, attorneys shift their attention to asset recovery and litigation.
Debt recovery starts with thorough investigations. Attorneys rely on public records to uncover assets such as real estate, business interests, and bank accounts before initiating lawsuits. Once valuable assets are identified, attorneys may file lawsuits and seek prejudgment attachments through ex parte motions. These motions allow them to freeze bank accounts or place liens on real estate before the debtor is even notified. Common types of attachments include:
After securing a judgment, attorneys use enforcement tools like Rule 69 depositions, wage garnishments, sheriff sales, and receivership appointments to recover funds. They can also use reach-and-apply injunctions to intercept money owed to the debtor by third parties. Many Boston attorneys offer flexible fee arrangements, such as contingent fees, hourly billing, or hybrid agreements.
Debt collection attorneys also assist businesses managing large debt portfolios. Their expertise ensures that each asset in the portfolio meets the legal requirements for recovery. When businesses purchase debt portfolios, attorneys conduct due diligence to confirm that documentation complies with Massachusetts litigation standards. For instance, they verify that every bill of sale or assignment document references an account number, ensuring standing in court.
For passive debt buyers, attorneys handle collections for delinquent accounts. According to the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court's decision in Dorrian v. LVNV Funding, LLC, passive buyers do not need a debt collector license under M.G.L. c. 93, § 24, provided they rely on attorneys or licensed collectors for recovery efforts. Beyond recovery, attorneys strengthen portfolios by reviewing and drafting credit applications, commercial leases, and American Institute of Architects (AIA) contracts, ensuring these documents favor creditors in disputes. They also manage specialized commercial debts, such as promissory notes, mechanic's liens, and foreign judgments requiring domestication for collection in Massachusetts.
"Typically, a receivable more than 60 to 90 days requires serious immediate action. If the customer refuses to enter into a written agreement... you have lost control of your money."
– Law Offices of Alan M. Cohen & Associates LLC
Finding the right attorney for your debt recovery needs can make all the difference in your success. To make an informed choice, you'll want to evaluate their expertise, fee structure, and how they handle initial consultations.
Start by confirming the attorney’s specialization. Do they focus on consumer debt under the FDCPA or commercial debt governed by the UCC? Ideally, you want someone who prioritizes debt recovery as a core part of their practice, not just an occasional case type.
Experience with local courts is another key factor. An attorney familiar with Massachusetts-specific garnishment and asset seizure rules can be more effective. Look for someone skilled in using aggressive prejudgment remedies like ex parte attachments, bank levies, or injunctions to freeze assets before they disappear.
Check their standing with the Massachusetts Bar Association to ensure there are no complaints or disciplinary issues. Peer recognition, such as high ratings from Martindale-Hubbell or distinctions like Super Lawyers in the "Creditor-Debtor Rights" category, can also reflect their credibility. Some Boston firms boast decades of experience in commercial debt litigation, so don’t hesitate to ask about their track record. For example, inquire about specific cases where they’ve successfully recovered debts through contract enforcement or judgment execution.
"A commercial collection attorney you can trust is invaluable to your business."
– Law Offices of Alan M. Cohen & Associates LLC
In Boston’s demanding legal environment, this level of expertise is crucial. Once you’ve confirmed their qualifications, it’s time to look at how they charge for their services.
Debt collection attorneys typically offer three main payment models:
Be aware that fees often increase after a lawsuit is filed, and some firms won’t accept contingency cases for debts under $2,500. Additional costs, such as court filing fees (ranging from $30 to $280) and sheriff service fees ($25 to $50 per defendant), may apply. Always clarify whether these costs are due upfront or only after a successful recovery.
"Choosing the lawyer with the lowest contingency fees can turn out to be a huge mistake. What percentage gets paid won't have relevance if they don't collect on it."
– Massachusetts Debt Collection Attorneys
Ultimately, the attorney’s effectiveness matters more than their fee percentage. Once you’ve reviewed payment options, your initial consultation will help you gauge their approach and professionalism.
The free initial consultation is your opportunity to assess the attorney’s communication skills, professionalism, and strategy. Ask whether they personally handle prejudgment motions or if they rely solely on demand letters. It’s also important to understand their asset investigation process - do they use public records to locate and verify assets like real estate, bank accounts, or business holdings before filing suit?
If your business operates in a niche industry, such as construction or healthcare, ask whether the attorney has experience with tools like mechanic’s liens or other industry-specific strategies. Be sure to request a detailed breakdown of all potential costs, including court and process server fees. Additionally, confirm their expertise with Massachusetts post-judgment tools, such as Rule 69 depositions, supplementary process, receivership, and sheriff sales.
"Listening attentively to my clients and meticulous preparation are indeed the hallmarks of success."
– David Katz, Attorney
Bring all relevant documents - contracts, invoices, payment records, and previous collection efforts - to the consultation. This allows the attorney to evaluate your case thoroughly and develop a tailored recovery plan. Taking these steps will help you build the trust and confidence needed to navigate Boston’s complex debt collection process effectively.
Understanding Massachusetts debt collection laws is essential for creditors and attorneys working in Boston. The state has stricter requirements than federal regulations, and violations can lead to heavy penalties under the Massachusetts Consumer Protection Act (M.G.L. c. 93A).
Debt collection in Massachusetts is governed by M.G.L. c. 93, § 49 and the Attorney General's regulations under 940 CMR 7.00. Unlike the federal Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA), which focuses on third-party debt collectors, Massachusetts law applies to original creditors, their attorneys, and debt buyers as well.
State laws impose strict rules on call frequency and timing. Calls are only allowed between 8:00 a.m. and 9:00 p.m., unless the debtor specifies different hours. If a debtor asks you to stop calling their workplace, you must comply with an oral request for 10 days, while a written request remains in effect until the debtor revokes it. These rules form the foundation for many practices outlined in later sections.
"Massachusetts law prohibits unfair or deceptive collection practices. The Attorney General has issued debt collection regulations that establish standards by defining unfair and deceptive acts and practices." – Office of the Attorney General
The statute of limitations for most consumer debts, such as credit cards and written contracts, is six years. However, if a court judgment is obtained, creditors have up to 20 years to collect. Additionally, Rule 8.1 requires creditors to provide detailed affidavits proving the entire chain of ownership when filing lawsuits.
Massachusetts courts also protect certain types of income, including Social Security, Unemployment, Workers' Compensation, and weekly earnings of $550 or less.
Beyond adhering to numerical limits, ethical practices are critical to respecting debtor rights. Attorneys must send a written validation notice within five business days of initial contact, detailing the debt amount and the creditor's name. If the debtor disputes the debt in writing within 30 days, all collection activity must stop until proper verification - such as a signed document or full payment ledger - is provided.
For time-barred debts (older than six years), creditors must disclose that the debt may be unenforceable in court and that any payment could restart the statute of limitations. Prohibited actions include threatening arrest, using offensive language, or contacting third parties without written consent.
While attorneys are not required to obtain a Division of Banks license, they must follow the Supreme Judicial Court's Rules of Professional Conduct and are subject to oversight by the Board of Bar Overseers. Violating the Attorney General's regulations also breaches the Massachusetts Consumer Protection Act (M.G.L. c. 93A), exposing creditors to significant damages and attorney fees.
Keeping detailed call logs, honoring stop requests, and verifying debt ownership before filing lawsuits are essential steps to prevent legal complications. These practices not only ensure compliance but also strengthen the credibility of debt collection efforts while safeguarding debtor rights and ensuring fair recovery processes.
Attorneys working in portfolio management go beyond standard recovery and litigation tasks. They tackle the specific legal complexities involved in buying and selling debt portfolios. Their role is to ensure compliance with Massachusetts regulations and safeguard both buyers and sellers from potential legal risks. For those managing large-scale debt investments, having legal counsel is crucial. They help verify documentation, establish clear ownership rights, and address disputes that could disrupt transactions.
When it comes to portfolio transactions, verifying the chain of ownership is critical. This step ensures legal standing in any future litigation. Attorneys carefully examine the chain of ownership and screen portfolios for debts that may have expired. They also ensure compliance with Massachusetts Rule of Civil Procedure 8.1, as even a single missing link in documentation can jeopardize legal standing in Massachusetts courts. Additionally, attorneys assess debtor assets, such as real estate or business holdings, to evaluate the actual recovery potential of the portfolio.
"A 'passive debt buyer,' i.e., an entity that buys debt for investment purposes and then hires licensed debt collectors or attorneys to collect the debt on its behalf, was not a 'debt collector' within the meaning of G. L. c. 93, § 24, and therefore did not need a license to operate."
– Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts (Dorrian v. LVNV Funding, LLC)
Attorneys also ensure that every transfer is thoroughly documented, filing affidavits under Rule 55.1 to secure default judgments. They verify that defendant addresses meet required timeframes, avoiding dismissals of collection actions. Once due diligence is complete, attorneys focus on resolving any disputes tied to the documentation.
Disputes often arise over documentation, and attorneys play a key role in resolving them. They ensure that bills of sale or assignments explicitly reference the correct account numbers. For example, the 2018 case Armata v. Target highlighted that Massachusetts' two-call-per-week regulation applies even if creditors fail to reach the debtor or leave a message. In some cases, attorneys may file ex parte attachments to secure assets swiftly, even before notifying the debtor.
Legal counsel also advises investors on licensing requirements. The Dorrian v. LVNV Funding, LLC ruling clarified that passive debt buyers - those purchasing debt for investment and hiring licensed attorneys for collection - are not required to obtain a Massachusetts Division of Banks license. These legal strategies demonstrate the critical role attorneys play in maintaining the integrity and security of debt investments.
Hiring a skilled debt collection attorney in Boston is crucial for anyone aiming to recover unpaid debts or manage debt portfolios effectively. These attorneys possess in-depth knowledge of Massachusetts laws, such as the Consumer Protection Act (G.L. c. 93A) and MGL c. 93, § 49, which outline prohibited collection practices. Without proper legal guidance, creditors risk violating these strict regulations, potentially leading to costly counterclaims. This highlights the importance of having specialized legal support throughout the collection process.
Experienced attorneys take swift action on overdue accounts, often within 60–90 days, using powerful tools to secure assets promptly. As Alan M. Cohen, Founder of the Law Offices of Alan M. Cohen & Associates LLC, emphasizes:
"Our philosophy is simple: Get you paid! We aggressively, relentlessly, ethically and effectively work to collect money from your debtor".
For portfolio investors, these attorneys provide critical services such as verifying ownership chains, ensuring compliance with Rule 8.1, and assessing recovery potential before closing transactions. The 2018 Dorrian v. LVNV Funding, LLC decision clarified that passive debt buyers who work with licensed attorneys are not required to obtain their own collection licenses, simplifying the process for managing portfolios.
Massachusetts court judgments also allow recovery efforts to extend from 6 to 20 years. This extended timeline makes professional legal representation an investment that can save both time and money while maximizing recovery.
Whether you're pursuing a single unpaid invoice or handling a complex debt portfolio, partnering with an experienced Boston attorney ensures compliance, improves recovery outcomes, and safeguards your legal position throughout the process.
If unpaid debts linger beyond 60–90 days or a debtor outright refuses to agree to repayment terms, it might be time to bring in a Boston debt collection attorney. These legal experts can navigate Massachusetts laws, ensuring every step is compliant while employing strategies like asset attachments to recover outstanding amounts. When initial efforts - like phone calls or demand letters - don’t work, attorneys can take the situation to the next level, especially for larger or ongoing debts, boosting the chances of successful recovery.
To establish debt ownership in Massachusetts, you'll need to gather specific records. These might include a ledger, account statement, or similar documentation that provides a clear picture of the debt. Key details to include are the date of the debt, its amount, any payments made, and the original creditor’s name and address (if they differ from the current creditor). These documents must clearly trace the debt's history and ownership to ensure they meet compliance standards.
After securing a judgment in Boston, there are several ways to recover the owed amount. These include wage garnishment, where a portion of the debtor's paycheck is directed to you, bank account levies, which allow funds to be taken directly from the debtor's account, and judgment liens on property, which can place a claim on the debtor's real estate.
However, enforcing these recovery methods often requires taking additional legal steps. To handle the process effectively and ensure everything aligns with Massachusetts laws, working with a debt collection attorney can be a smart move. They can guide you through the complexities and help enforce the judgment successfully.
More than a decade of Ivan's career has been dedicated to Finance, Banking and Digital Solutions. From these three areas, the idea of a fintech solution called Debepxert was born. He started his career in Big Four consulting and continued in the industry, working as a CFO for publicly traded and digital companies. Ivan came into the debt industry in 2019, when company Debexpert started its first operations. Over the past few years the company, following his lead, has become a technological leader in the US, opened its offices in 10 countries and achieved a record level of sales - 700 debt portfolios per year.
.svg){kind=icon}
.svg){kind=icon}
.svg){kind=icon}
