This text has undergone thorough fact-checking to ensure accuracy and reliability. All information presented is backed by verified sources and reputable data. By adhering to stringent fact-checking standards, we aim to provide you with reliable and trustworthy content. You can trust the information presented here to make informed decisions with confidence.
Debt collection agencies in California operate under some of the strictest regulations in the United States. They recover unpaid debts for businesses and creditors while ensuring compliance with state and federal laws. California's Rosenthal Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (Rosenthal Act) and the Debt Collection Licensing Act (DCLA) set clear rules for how agencies must operate, including licensing requirements, consumer protections, and limitations on aggressive tactics.
Key highlights:
When choosing a debt collection agency in California, ensure they are licensed, compliant with state laws, and experienced in handling your specific type of debt. Agencies like The Kaplan Group and Allied Collection Services of California are reputable options known for their expertise in commercial and consumer debt recovery. Always verify an agency's license through the NMLS Consumer Access portal before engaging their services.
California vs Federal Debt Collection Laws Comparison
California has established strict rules for debt collection through two primary laws: the Rosenthal Fair Debt Collection Practices Act and the Debt Collection Licensing Act. These laws set clear standards for collector behavior and require formal licensing for agencies operating in the state. Below is an overview of these laws and how they shape debt collection practices in California.
The Rosenthal Act is California's main law aimed at preventing unfair, deceptive, and abusive debt collection practices. Unlike the federal FDCPA, the Rosenthal Act applies to both original creditors (like credit card companies collecting their own debts) and third-party collection agencies. This broad coverage ensures that even original creditors must follow strict rules.
Under California Civil Code § 1788.17, most of the federal FDCPA's provisions apply, but original creditors are exempt from including the "mini-Miranda" disclosure or issuing formal debt validation notices. The Act also limits aggressive tactics, such as misleading communication or excessive contact with a debtor's employer. Employers can only be contacted to verify employment or handle wage garnishment after a court judgment.
A significant update is coming on July 1, 2025, when Senate Bill 1286 will expand the Rosenthal Act to include "covered commercial debt." This will apply to small business or commercial debts up to $500,000 guaranteed by an individual, extending consumer-like protections to certain business debts. However, the changes will only affect debts entered into, renewed, sold, or assigned on or after this date.
"SB 1286's amendments to the Rosenthal Act will apply only to commercial credit or debts 'entered into, renewed, sold, or assigned on or after July 1, 2025'"
Violations of the Rosenthal Act carry serious consequences. Statutory damages for "willful and knowing" violations range from $100 to $1,000 per infraction, in addition to actual damages and attorney's fees. Collectors are allowed a 15-day period to fix any correctable violations once identified.
Key court cases have clarified the Act's scope. For example, in Davidson v. Seterus, Inc. (21 Cal.App.5th 283, 2018), the California Court of Appeal ruled that mortgage servicers fall under the Act. Similarly, in Best v. Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLC (2021 WL 2024716), the court determined that nonjudicial foreclosure proceedings are covered, especially after amendments included mortgage debt as consumer debt.
The Debt Collection Licensing Act (DCLA), effective in 2022, requires most entities that regularly collect consumer debt in California to obtain a license from the Department of Financial Protection and Innovation (DFPI). This includes debt buyers and out-of-state agencies.
The licensing process is managed through the Nationwide Multistate Licensing System & Registry (NMLS) and involves several steps:
Once licensed, agencies must display their California debt collector license number in at least 12-point type on all communications, whether written or digital. Annual reporting is mandatory, with reports for the 2025 calendar year due by March 16, 2026. Agencies must also pay a minimum annual assessment fee of $250, plus a pro rata share of DFPI costs based on net proceeds.
Certain entities are exempt from DCLA licensing, such as FDIC-insured banks, credit unions, DFPI-licensed finance lenders, and mortgage lenders, but they are still required to comply with the Rosenthal Act.
California's debt collection laws go beyond federal requirements. While the FDCPA primarily regulates third-party collectors, the Rosenthal Act extends these rules to original creditors and others who collect consumer debts. This broader coverage provides additional protections for consumers.
Here’s a quick comparison of federal and California laws:
| Feature | Federal FDCPA | California Rosenthal Act |
|---|---|---|
| Original Creditors | Generally No | Yes |
| Commercial Debt | No | Yes (up to $500,000 as of July 2025) |
| State Licensing | No | Yes (via DCLA) |
| Statutory Damages | Up to $1,000 | $100 to $1,000 for willful violations |
The Rosenthal Act incorporates most FDCPA obligations under California Civil Code § 1788.17, meaning violations of federal standards often result in state law violations as well.
"The Rosenthal Act also requires that original creditors comply with most parts of the federal FDCPA"
California’s licensing rules under the DCLA add another layer of accountability not found in federal law.
"any person engaging in the business of debt collection in California first obtain a license from the Commissioner of Business Oversight"
Operating without a license can result in legal penalties, and collectors must comply with additional state-specific requirements. For example, they must notify consumers if a debt is time-barred (past the statute of limitations) and include their California license number in all communications. Claims under the Rosenthal Act are subject to a one-year statute of limitations.
For any agency operating in California, compliance with both state and federal laws is non-negotiable. These rules shape everything from staff training to operational procedures, ensuring greater accountability and transparency in debt collection practices.
California is home to several well-established debt collection agencies, each with a strong track record in handling various types of debt. The Kaplan Group, in operation since 1991, focuses exclusively on commercial (B2B) collections, particularly on claims exceeding $2,000. They boast an impressive 85% success rate for claims over $10,000 owed by open businesses. What sets them apart is their approach - relying on personalized negotiation rather than automated systems. Their clients span industries like high-tech, manufacturing, entertainment, and healthcare, and their team includes collectors with advanced degrees and over a decade of experience to manage complex negotiations.
"The Kaplan Group is a really effective collection firm. Dean and the crew are great at negotiating and thorough in communicating with us. They provide good advice but also listen very well to what we have to say." – Mary P., Electronics Distributor
Another major player, Allied Collection Services of California, operates as a full-service agency managing over 1,000,000 accounts with a combined portfolio value exceeding $3.5 billion. Their expertise extends across medical, financial, educational, and retail debts, and they actively oversee more than $27 million in garnishments and levies.
Collection Bureau of America (CBA), founded in 1959, handles both consumer and commercial debts, specializing in areas like utilities, municipal services, and medical collections. As a certified minority-owned business, CBA operates both locally and nationally, leveraging technology to enhance collection rates and streamline processes.
Both The Kaplan Group and Allied Collection Services employ in-house legal teams to pursue claims when necessary. Most agencies in California work on a contingency basis, charging between 10% and 25%, depending on the size and age of the claim. This "no-collect, no-fee" model ensures clients only pay if the agency successfully recovers the debt.
While these firms offer broad expertise, others focus on niche markets, providing tailored services for specific industries.
Some agencies specialize in addressing the unique needs of particular industries, offering more targeted strategies. Tavelli Co., Inc., for instance, concentrates on medical debt and collections for small-to-midsize businesses. Their approach emphasizes empathy and consultation, which clients appreciate for its professionalism. This focus is especially critical in healthcare, where California law mandates that hospitals and collection agencies wait 180 days after initial billing before reporting negative information to credit bureaus or filing civil complaints.
These agencies illustrate the changing dynamics of debt collection in California, where compliance, specialization, and technology-driven methods play a central role. Importantly, all agencies must maintain valid DFPI licensing under the Debt Collection Licensing Act.
In California, debt collection agencies acquire portfolios through various channels, with charged-off consumer debt being the most common. Charged-off debt refers to debt that creditors have classified as a loss. When evaluating these purchases, agencies calculate "Net Proceeds", which is the total amount collected minus the purchase price of the debt, excluding operating costs.
"A 'debt buyer' means a person or entity that is regularly engaged in the business of purchasing charged-off consumer debt for collection purposes, whether it collects the debt itself, hires a third-party for collection or hires an attorney-at-law for collection litigation." – California Department of Financial Protection and Innovation
For tax-defaulted property debt, county tax collectors often rely on public auctions as the primary sales method. Other methods include sealed bid sales and negotiated sales with public agencies or nonprofits. To reach a broader audience, some California counties list tax-defaulted land on platforms like Bid4Assets.com, which allows for more extensive bidder participation. Online trading platforms have further simplified the acquisition process, enabling agencies to evaluate portfolios and participate in auctions seamlessly. Agencies also ensure compliance by verifying their NMLS licensing and bond requirements before each acquisition.
Once portfolios are acquired, agencies increasingly leverage modern technology to enhance their recovery efforts.
After securing debt portfolios, agencies use advanced technology to improve recovery processes. Automated systems now handle the entire collections cycle, minimizing manual work and reducing errors. Tools powered by Artificial Intelligence (AI) and predictive analytics assess debtor behavior, forecast repayment probabilities, and refine strategies using risk scoring. The AI market in debt collection is anticipated to grow significantly, reaching $15.9 billion by 2034, with a compound annual growth rate of 16.90% starting in 2025.
Omnichannel platforms provide communication options like SMS, email, WhatsApp, and live chat, allowing debtors to interact through their preferred methods. Self-service portals further empower consumers by letting them manage accounts, set up repayment plans, and make payments anytime, reducing the need for direct agent involvement. Skip-tracing tools, capable of accessing over 125 billion records from more than 10,000 data sources, help locate hard-to-find debtors.
"Lateral has allowed us to triple our case load without increasing any staff. Without it, we would need twice as many people doing manual processes." – David Asker, The Sheriffs Office
In California's tech-driven economy, specialized software now intercepts recurring SaaS and enterprise payments, often outperforming traditional garnishment methods. Compliance automation tools ensure adherence to regulations like the FDCPA, TCPA, and California-specific laws, including the Rosenthal Fair Debt Collection Practices Act, by providing real-time monitoring and built-in regulatory frameworks. Implementing advanced collection software has proven to cut collection costs by up to 30% while boosting team productivity by an average of 50%.
California has a strict legal framework for debt collection agencies, so it's crucial to ensure any agency you're considering complies with the Debt Collection Licensing Act (DCLA). Here's a quick checklist to help you verify compliance:
"Licensees are required to include their California debt collector license numbers when contacting or communicating with debtors as required under Civil Code section 1788.11." – California Department of Financial Protection and Innovation (DFPI)
Additionally, check DFPI public records for any red flags, such as "desist and refrain" orders, summary suspensions, or license revocations. These issues could indicate non-compliance. It's also important to confirm that the agency adheres to Assembly Bill 430, which mandates stopping collection activities if a debtor submits a signed FTC Identity Theft Report.
To gauge an agency's reliability, start by reviewing its regulatory history for any enforcement actions or violations noted in DFPI records. Membership in organizations like the California Association of Collectors is another positive sign, as these groups promote education in legal and ethical practices.
Ask the agency for a sample validation notice to ensure they comply with legal requirements. This notice should include the debt amount and the creditor's name and must be sent within five days of initial contact. If the agency operates through affiliates or branch offices, confirm that these entities also hold the necessary licenses.
Once you've confirmed compliance and solid performance, evaluate whether the agency's expertise aligns with your specific debt recovery needs.
After ensuring compliance and a good reputation, focus on finding an agency that specializes in your type of debt. Here's what to look for:
| Debt Type | Criteria | Regulation |
|---|---|---|
| Medical Debt | Ability to verify insurance with employers | Rosenthal Act / DCLA |
| Charged-off Debt | Specialization in portfolio acquisition and recovery | California law |
| Consumer Debt | Adherence to no-contact and harassment rules | Rosenthal Act |
| Time-Barred Debt | Knowledge of the four-year statute of limitations | California Civil Code |
Matching the agency's expertise to your specific debt type ensures a smoother and more effective collection process.
Choosing a debt collection agency in California involves more than just evaluating recovery rates - it requires a deep understanding of the state’s strict regulatory landscape. California's Rosenthal Fair Debt Collection Practices Act extends its reach beyond third-party collectors to include original creditors, setting it apart from federal laws. Adding to this, Senate Bill 1286, effective July 1, 2025, will bring commercial debts under $500,000 into the fold, requiring agencies to adhere to consumer-style conduct rules even in business-to-business collections. These unique legal requirements shape the state's debt collection market, blending rigorous compliance with strategic recovery methods.
When selecting an agency, confirm they have an active DCLA license through the NMLS Consumer Access portal, maintain the mandatory $25,000 surety bond, and comply with all state regulations. Failure to meet these standards can lead to significant legal liabilities, including statutory damages and attorney’s fees. Willful violations carry severe penalties, making compliance non-negotiable.
Such measures are essential to reducing legal risks while ensuring effective recovery. With California's average debt per resident nearing $86,000 in 2024, partnering with agencies that fully understand these regulatory demands is critical.
Experts like attorney Amy Loftsgordon and partner Krista Cooley emphasize that the expansion of consumer-style protections to commercial debts under Senate Bill 1286 further complicates compliance. This evolving landscape requires both agencies and businesses to stay vigilant and prioritize adherence to these legal standards. By doing so, you can safeguard your business and enhance debt recovery outcomes.
To check if a California debt collector is properly licensed, use the official licensee search tool provided by the California Department of Financial Protection and Innovation (DFPI). You can visit the DFPI’s Licensee and Financial Service Provider Search page or navigate to the specific section for debt collection licensees. This tool helps confirm whether the collector holds a valid license and is in good standing with the state.
Debt collectors in California, operating under the Rosenthal Act, are allowed to reach out to individuals to collect debts. However, they must follow a strict set of rules. They are prohibited from using any unfair, misleading, or harassing tactics. Additionally, they must comply with regulations regarding when and how they can contact debtors, as well as ensure all communication remains truthful. These guidelines are in place to protect consumers and promote fair practices in debt collection.
Starting July 1, 2025, California will expand the Rosenthal Fair Debt Collection Practices Act to include specific small business or commercial debts. This update brings new responsibilities for debt collectors, such as obtaining licenses, meeting reporting requirements, and adhering to compliance standards for debts owed or guaranteed by California residents. The goal is to provide stronger oversight and safeguards for impacted businesses.
More than a decade of Ivan's career has been dedicated to Finance, Banking and Digital Solutions. From these three areas, the idea of a fintech solution called Debepxert was born. He started his career in Big Four consulting and continued in the industry, working as a CFO for publicly traded and digital companies. Ivan came into the debt industry in 2019, when company Debexpert started its first operations. Over the past few years the company, following his lead, has become a technological leader in the US, opened its offices in 10 countries and achieved a record level of sales - 700 debt portfolios per year.
.svg){kind=icon}
.svg){kind=icon}
.svg){kind=icon}
